I’m trying to study a bit for the upcoming exams, one of them is for a weirdly structured “geometry” course made up by 2/3 intro Differential Geometry (smooth manifolds) and 1/3 Algebraic Geometry (disappointingly ‘800 style i.e. no schemes, just a ton of examples and definitions and boredom).
I’ll try to do some of the exercises, typing them up is more of a challenge to myself and a way to motivate me slightly more (such is life), this is just a disclaimer that this kind of post may be super boring even moreso than usual.
Let’s talk about the twisted cubic. It’s a curve that arises as a special case of the Veronese map
or, in affine coordinates, by . In other words we are talking about .
Exercise 1. Consider the following homogenous polynomials , and and the quadrics they define in . Prove that .
Ok, it’s straightforward to prove that a point of is in the zero locus of all three polynomials, let’s do the converse.
Let , since we are in projective space we know these coordinates cannot all be zero, thus we note that cannot be simultaneously zero otherwise $latex F_0(p) = z_0z_2 – z_1^2 = 0$ implies and implies .
Suppose , then we find a preimage for through the Veronese map, namely , indeed since must satisfy those polynomial relations we see implies and implies , thus .
(and similarly in the case ).
Exercise 2. Prove that all three quadrics are necessary, namely that any two of them intersect in the twisted cubic plus a line:
This is only slightly more involved, I’m going to do it with the first two quadrics. Let .
If then, as before, , this time though becomes just the null polynomial giving no information and there’s no other relation. Thus any point of the form belongs to the intersection (and this is the line).
If then we do the same trick as before deducing the relations from the polynomials and verifying that indeed .
Leave a comment